We pull public videos from a fixed list of channels, take the transcript (YouTube captions where available, otherwise local speech recognition), and keep the timestamp of every sentence.
A call must name a specific asset, a direction, and a horizon. "Bitcoin to 120k by June" is a call. "The market looks interesting" is not. Conditional technical setups count when the speaker states which side they lean on and holds a position or a target. A statement with equal weight on both outcomes is not a call, and neither is a prediction someone else made that the speaker only repeats.
| Type | Hit | Stopped out | Miss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up with a target | High reaches the target before the deadline | Low hits the speaker's own invalidation level first | Deadline passes, target not reached |
| Down with a target | Low reaches the target | High hits the invalidation level first | Deadline passes, target not reached |
| Direction only | Price moved at least 3% the right way by the deadline | — | Anything else |
| Sideways | Price stayed inside a 5% band | — | Band broken |
A channel that publishes daily will restate the same view in every video. Counting each mention separately would measure how often someone posts, not how often they are right. So when the same person repeats the same direction on the same asset while the earlier call is still open, and with a target within ten percent, we link it to the original and leave it out of the score. The card shows how many times a call was restated, because that number is interesting on its own.
Accuracy is hits divided by resolved calls. Open calls are excluded. A channel that makes one lucky call is not better than one that makes fifty and gets 40% right, so the number of resolved calls is always shown next to the percentage.
We publish two numbers. Accuracy covers every resolved call. Direct calls counts only outright statements and drops conditional setups of the form "if we close above X, then Y" — those depend on a trigger that may never fire, so judging them the same way is unfair to people who hedge carefully. The two numbers often differ, and the gap itself says something about how a channel talks.
Where a channel's captions are missing we use speech recognition, and it mishears coin names. We correct the spelling of tickers against exchange listings and drop anything we cannot identify, which means a small number of real calls are lost rather than logged wrong. Calls about stocks and indices are not tracked at all — this is a crypto scoreboard.
We do not rate people, only statements. We do not call anyone a fraud. We do not publish a call without the quote, the date and the price. Where speech recognition mangles a coin name, we correct the spelling but never the meaning. Nothing on this site is financial advice.
If a call is mis-transcribed, mis-dated, or judged against the wrong level, we will fix it and say so. Every entry links back to the source video at the exact second.